SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Peter Dierks who wrote (40437)9/16/2005 11:37:19 PM
From: Proud_Infidel  Respond to of 90947
 
Blair ‘shocked’ over BBC Katrina coverage
By Joshua Chaffin and Aline van Duyn in New York
Published: September 17 2005 00:38 | Last updated: September 17 2005 00:38

Tony Blair was shocked by the BBC's coverage of Hurricane Katrina's devastation of New Orleans, describing it as “full of hatred of America”, Rupert Murdoch, chairman and chief executive of News Corporation, revealed on Friday night.

Mr Murdoch, a long-time critic of the BBC who controls rival Sky News, said the prime minister had recounted his feelings in a private conversation earlier this week in New York.

news.ft.com



To: Peter Dierks who wrote (40437)9/17/2005 4:01:07 AM
From: Solon  Respond to of 90947
 
"You have again made the unsubstantiated claim that drug companies get funding for research from government sources."

It is not even debatable. Why be silly about this?

"Prove you allegation. before making rash accusations"

YOU made the allegations that other countries were not pulling their weight! Do you want me to pull up your posts or will you admit it?!

"You have written like a true socialist. From each according to his abilities, and to each according to his needs."

I was hoping you would not be a liar and a phoney. I spoke to YOUR socialistic comments..AS YOU SO WELL KNOW.

You were trying to blame other countries for the fact that Americans pay the highest prescription drug costs in the world. I pointed out that American Drug Companies are clearing billions of dollars profit per year. I pointed out that they are using Puerto Rico as a tax haven. I asked a simple question: If these Fat Cats are so rich and are making so much money...then WHY do you think that your HIGH DRUG COSTS flow from R&D!!!???

Something difficult about this question???

And why do you blame others for these high costs? I pointed out that you were putting forth a SOCIALIST attitude.

We don't owe you a living. I'm not going to subsidize you for your bloody rip-off drug costs. Face the bastards down or join a gym.

Don't cavil to me. You don't like paying the highest prices in the world for drugs, then talk to the Fat Cats. I don't need to hear your socialistic crap about subsidizing you. You're on your own. I gave money to New Orleans, but I won't give a penny to subsidize your socialist ideals or the FAT CATS you are bowing to.

They won't even sell you two twenty twos down there, HUH? You can't be trusted to handle aspirin and codeine at the same time? Lord love a duck. Must never have a choice. Bunch of socialist children...



To: Peter Dierks who wrote (40437)9/17/2005 9:27:58 AM
From: Proud_Infidel  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 90947
 
Student Arrested After Pilot Uniform Found

Friday, September 16, 2005

sfgate.com

(09-16) 20:39 PDT Memphis, Tenn. (AP) --

A university student from Egypt was ordered held without bond after prosecutors said they found a pilot's uniform, chart of Memphis International Airport and a DVD titled "How an Airline Captain Should Look and Act" in his apartment.

The FBI is investigating whether Mahmoud Maawad, 29, had any connection to terrorists. He is awaiting trial on charges of wire fraud and fraudulent use of a Social Security number.

Maawad, who is in the United States illegally, told the judge during a hearing Thursday that he is studying science and economics at the University of Memphis.

"My school is everything. I stay in this country for seven years; I stay for the school," he said.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Steve Parker said Thursday that the airport-related items were found during a Sept. 9 search.

"The specific facts and circumstances are scary," Parker said.

U.S. Magistrate Judge S. Thomas Anderson ruled that Maawad be held without bond.

"It is hard for the court to understand why he has a large concentration of those (aviation) items, and nothing else to indicate Mr. Maawad plans to stay in the community," Anderson said.

Maawad had ordered $3,000 in aviation materials, including DVDs titled "Ups and Downs of Takeoffs and Landings,""Airplane Talk,""Mental Math for Pilots" and "Mastering GPS Flying," FBI agent Thad Gulczynski testified.

The company reported Maawad to authorities when he didn't pay for $2,500 of merchandise it had delivered, Gulczynski said.



To: Peter Dierks who wrote (40437)9/17/2005 12:43:34 PM
From: Solon  Respond to of 90947
 
The Fleecing og America by drug companies.

bernie.house.gov

"One drug company, Merck, pocketed more in pure profit than all of the airline companies on the Fortune 500 list, and bested the entertainment and construction industries as well. Most significantly, the pharmaceutical's 18.9% profit-to-revenue ratio was, by far, the highest margin of any industry in the nation."

____________________________

Questions about government funded drug research.

ncpa.org

________________________________________

According to the Congressional Joint Economic Committee Report (2000), the Federal Government funds 36 % of medical research.

Here is 27 pages of commentary on the fleecing of America by the FAT CATS.

bernie.house.gov

_______________________________________

"Drug companies spent $2 billion in 2001 on events for doctors -- double the amount spent in 1996. When a medical expert advises the government, we expect his or her recommendations aren't influenced by bribes from drug companies. Unfortunately the pattern of corruption among medical experts funded by pharmaceutical companies has now tainted credibility to the point of public distrust."

optimumhealthreport.com



To: Peter Dierks who wrote (40437)9/17/2005 12:58:02 PM
From: Solon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 90947
 
"The pharmaceutical industry has been the most profitable industry in the U.S. for each of the past 10 years. In 2001, their profits represented an 18.5 percent return on revenue-nearly six times as large as the median return (3.3 percent) for Fortune 500 companies"

tilrc.org

Drug Company Profits Exceeded R&D Spending by 60 Percent
Executive Compensation and Deferred Stock Options Were Huge
From Families USA

Next Article | Aug/Sept Archive| Home Page | Previous Article

WASHINGTON--U.S. drug companies that market the 50 most often prescribed drugs to seniors spent almost two-and-one-half times as much on marketing, advertising, and administration as they spent on research and development (R&D) in 2001, according to an analysis released today. The report debunks President Bush's recent assertion, and drug companies' claims, that high and fast-rising drug prices are needed to support R&D.

The report was released as the United States Senate debates legislation that could add prescription drug coverage for America's seniors and could stimulate faster market entry of cheaper generic drugs.

According to the report, compiled by the consumer health organization Families USA, the nine U.S. publicly traded companies that market many of the most popular drugs to seniors spent a total of $45.4 billion on marketing, advertising, and administration and only $19.1 billion on R&D last year. Eight of the nine companies spent more than twice as much on marketing, advertising, and administration as they did on R&D.

Here they are listed by Company Name, % of Revenues Spent on Marketing/Advertising/Administration and % Spent on R&D:

Merck, 13%, 5%
Pfizer, 35%, 15%
Bristol-Myers Squibb, 27%, 12%
Abbott Laboratories, 23%, 10%
Wyeth, 37%, 13%
Pharmacia, 44%, 16%
Eli Lilly, 30%, 19%
Schering-Plough, 36%, 13%
Allergan, 42%, 15%
"At the same time that drug prices are skyrocketing, pharmaceutical companies are focusing more and more on marketing the most expensive drugs," said Ron Pollack, Families USA's executive director. "The result is a sky rocketing cost spiral that is making drugs increasingly unaffordable for America's seniors."

The Families USA report also demonstrated that drug companies pocketed much more in profits than they spent on R&D. The nine companies generated $30.6 billion in profits last year-more than 60 percent higher than their expenditures on R&D. Merck's profits, for example, were nearly three times the amount it spent on R&D in 2001. Bristol-Myers Squibb's profits were more than twice the amount it spent on R&D.

Drug company executives also received high compensation packages and held huge amounts of unexercised stock options, according to the Families USA report. The five highest-paid drug company executives received over $183 million in compensation, not including unexercised stock options. In 2001, the five highest-paid drug executives at the nine companies were:

C.A. Heimbold, Jr., Former Chairman & CEO, Bristol-Myers Squibb, $74.9 million
John R. Stafford, Chairman, Wyeth, $40.5 million
William C. Steere, Former Chairman, Pfizer, $28.3 million
Henry A. McKinnell, Chairman and CEO, Pfizer, $23.8 million
John F. Niblack,Vice Chairman, Pfizer, $15.9 million
For the nine companies, the five drug company executives with the highest amount in unexercised stock options held more than $332 million in such stock options in 2001. The executives with the largest stock options were:

Raymond V. Gilmartin; Chairman, President and CEO; Merck; $93.3 million
C.A. Heimbold, Jr.; Former Chairman and CEO; Bristol-Myers Squibb; $76.1 million
William C. Steere,Former Chairman, Pfizer, $60.2 million
Henry A. McKinnell, Chairman and CEO, Pfizer, $56.5 million
Sidney Taurel; Chairman, President and CEO; Eli Lilly; $46.2 million
The pharmaceutical industry has been the most profitable industry in the U.S. for each of the past 10 years. In 2001, their profits represented an 18.5 percent return on revenue-nearly six times as large as the median return (3.3 percent) for Fortune 500 companies.

"The drug industry should stop scaring America's seniors with false claims that drug price moderation will prevent research on new medicines," said Pollack. "In light of huge industry profits, enormous executive compensation packages, and big marketing budgets, those claims are both irresponsible and wrong."

The Families USA report analyzed the spending, profits, and executive compensation in each of the U.S. drug companies that market (or are the parent corporations of the companies that market) the top 50 drugs prescribed to seniors. The companies included in the report are: Merck & Company, Inc.; Pfizer, Inc.; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company; Abbott Laboratories; Wyeth; Pharmacia Corporation; Eli Lilly & Co.; Schering-Plough Corporation; and Allergan, Inc. All of the data in the report were drawn from the most recent filings to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) by the companies.

The report is available on the Families USA Web site at, www.familiesusa.org.

Families USA is the national organization for health care consumers. It is nonprofit and nonpartisan and advocates for high-quality, affordable health care for all Americans.