SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: stockman_scott who wrote (67103)9/17/2005 1:29:21 AM
From: American SpiritRespond to of 81568
 
Bushies are guilty of treason on Wilson-Plame and they know it. But what's a little treason between patriotic rightwingers? Anything to protect the phony excuses for miring us in a useless war.



To: stockman_scott who wrote (67103)9/18/2005 1:36:03 AM
From: Dan B.Respond to of 81568
 
That article, IMHO, ignores the fact that the British still stand by their story, and does not provide sufficient details - as didn't Wilson himself - to begin to prove the contention that Iraq (or some cooperative associate/party) didn't seek to aquire the material in question.

Need I say more? Well, nothing but a question. What proves the intelligence report false? I think we've been provided no answer to that question - not even a beginning of one - for all the words, suspicions, and outright allegations in that article. Therefore, the positive indication from British intelligence remains viable. That's just honest, IMO. The Valerie Plame issue itself is plainly logically unrelated to THIS issue. When it comes to this issue, it matters not a whit if She was or wasn't claimed rightly or wrongly by whomever whenever, to be undercover, just CIA, or not. It's a wholly separate issue, and any requested further investigation would have to recognize this, if it is honest.

Dan B.