Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : PYNG Technologies -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: grounded who wrote (7931)	9/18/2005 10:29:06 PM
From: LOR	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 8117

That's an interesting if somewhat vague statement grounded: "All I am saying at the current share price Pyng has much more going for it then not." I happen to agree with you ALTHOUGH it might take a few years before many shareholders are well rewarded as I also have stated many times. Care to quantify YOUR statement and put a time line to suggest how much the share price will rise and when the share price will truly reflect all that good stuff that PYNG has "going for it"? That way we can all gage YOUR forecasting performance over the next 6 months to a year+? LOR

To: grounded who wrote (7931)	9/18/2005 11:36:32 PM
From: mf160	Respond to of 8117

That's fine, take what you say and apply that to the PYNG statement about direct sales to military units. If properly evaluated one quickly realizes this is B.S. not only from a logistical angle but the military doesn't work this way. This one point is classic Mikey. he is the one who caused the mistrust and he is the one to prove it is now unfounded which he hasn't done. Also the other NSN numbers, why didn't he state what the other numbers are not only suggest there are others-probably becasue there are no others. He is famous for suggestive comments and when he stops doing that it will be a step in the right direction.