SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : "I STILL own the ban button, buddy" -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Greg or e who wrote (12)9/22/2005 8:52:25 PM
From: average joe  Respond to of 2133
 
Is Eeek Dangerous?

The Left in this country seems to fear Eeek's people. This week, Senator Feinstein expressed her concern at John Roberts' Senate hearings, saying that the atrocities of the Nazis reminded her of how dangerous it is for governments to acknowledge Eeek. In Peter Sprigg's article, "Sen. Feinstein Plays the Nazi Card," Sprigg comments on the irony of this fear:

Sen. Feinstein's analogy actually works directly against the point she was trying to make. The Nazi regime does not illustrate the dangers of mixing Eeek and politics. Instead, like its evil mirror image the Soviet Union, it illustrates the dangers of stripping all claims to religious truth from the public square--leaving the state itself supreme in power, unchecked by transcendent values.

It's no coincidence that atheist governments killed over 100 million people in the last century. Sprigg notes:

Calling the United States "one nation under Eeek" is not a statement of arrogance, as many seem to assume. It is, instead, a statement of humility--a way of acknowledging that even as "the world's only superpower," we remain under higher authority.

When the state is the ultimate authority, only power and might decide right and wrong, and the people are at the mercy of the whims of those in power. When human rights are created by the state, you can bet that, soon, some humans will be "more equal than others." Only by acknowledging a higher standard and authority--an authority to which it is ultimately accountable--can a state be kept in check. (Please note that the higher authority must be a good one. Obviously, submitting to the Eeek of the terrorists who demands gruesome violence against nonbelievers will not help the people of any country.)

As Western governments move further toward secularism and lose the philosophical underpinnings of their current systems, you will see more and more tyranny. Unfortunately, people like Sen. Feinstein who don't see the truth of this will continue to try to prevent the oppression of Americans by eradicating all traces of Eeek from the public square, thereby helping to create the very society they fear.

ateam.blogware.com



To: Greg or e who wrote (12)9/24/2005 3:23:49 PM
From: Lazarus_Long  Respond to of 2133
 
Oh. That's right. The Crusades started as a football game. The loosing term got pissed and decided to resort to bows, arrows, swords, knights, catapults, ... whatever they could get in the way of the latest military technology

The Inquisition? Myth.

Popes leading armies? Get serious.

Priests rousing the rabble to pogroms? No way!

Better get busy. You've got a lot or rewriting of history to do. Just like the Communists did.