Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Classic TA Workplace -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Henry J Costanzo who wrote (124290)	9/20/2005 2:27:14 PM
From: Moominoid	Respond to of 209892

The only real change is that Olson voted against. No sign of any let up in planned future rate increases as far as I can see. Will invert the yield curve at this rate.

To: Henry J Costanzo who wrote (124290)	9/20/2005 2:27:23 PM
From: Henry J Costanzo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 209892

Fed...PS Description of monetary policy unchanged,, LIkely future policy unchanged. FFunds rate up 1/4 to 3 3/4.

To: Henry J Costanzo who wrote (124290)	9/20/2005 2:30:27 PM
From: The Freep	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 209892

Oh, Sure, MC... you get the Fed statement stuff right in advance, but you fail to connect the dots and show us the effect of the Fed move on the price of tea in China. Without that, your posts are FA gibberish to me. In my brief times home today, I've been watching LEN continue its three day fall (without the other homies) and watching IBM rebound nicely off a new low to stay in that consolidation. Coulda broken down. Didn't. Maybe the whole fate of the Dow rests on IBM <g> the freep