Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: longnshort who wrote (67242)	9/20/2005 11:04:27 PM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 81568

Saddam was less of a threat to us than Texas oil thieves. Correct? How much have we lost from gas gouging versus the worst Saddam could have done to us, assuming he even wanted to attack us, which he he never has. Saddam had no WMD's, no nukes especially, no air force, no Al Qaida contacts and was in a box with us watching his every move 24-7. Not only that, we had the UN's support to tighten sacntions against him and inspect every inch of his country. The UN inspectors were in there with full access. Meanwhile Osama and Al-Zawahiri walk free and are still a powerful menace. Bushies don't seem the least bit concerned about that four years after 9-11. Meanwhile the Texas oil gougers have ripped this country off for hundreds of billions and rising all the time. WAKE UP!