SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: BEEF JERKEY who wrote (703040)9/21/2005 5:30:29 PM
From: Bill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
The issue isn't whether art is good, or whether you are smart enough to appreciate it. It's that our government shouldn't be in the business of subsidizing it. And our government shouldn't be in the business of buying art objects to decorate the offices of government bureaucrats. Why should the government be able to take $13.00 away from me to pay for art when I have kids to feed tonight? Get it?



To: BEEF JERKEY who wrote (703040)9/21/2005 6:15:07 PM
From: Bill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
In addition, there is the issue of incompetence that needs to be considered as we look at the way our hard earned money is being spent.

Big Dig officials withdraw from state fund after mistaken building estimate

September 21, 2005

BOSTON --An error estimating the value of a building forced Big Dig officials to take $67 million from a state transportation fund for other projects to plug the hole in their budget, officials of the underground highway project said.

The officials of the $14.6 billion Big Dig, officially known as the Central Artery and Third Harbor Tunnel project, also announced Tuesday that some completion dates have been pushed back.

The Big Dig's budget shortfall resulted because of an expectation that the sale of the project's Kneeland Street 10-story headquarters building would bring in about $94 million. But the only bid for the former Wang Computer building was less than a third of that amount, according to officials, so the sale was put off.

The Big Dig moved to identify alternative revenue sources, including the $67 million from the state's Transportation Infrastructure Fund, which funds smaller road and bridge projects, and $27 million from the proceeds of a 2003 sale of a 75-acre parcel in Allston.

In an e-mail response to questions, spokeswoman Mariellen Burns for the Massachusetts Turnpike Authority, which oversees the Big Dig, said officials identified the problem last year, and informed federal and state officials about plans to use other real estate revenue, as well as money from the state road and bridge fund.

Burns said the state inspector general's office has yet to sign off on the financing plan.

U.S. Department of Transportation Inspector General Kenneth Mead's office also has not approved the backup financing plan, which could further delay approval of $81 million in national funds earmarked for completion of the project.

"They are not going to release the $81 million until they're satisfied." said Rep. Michael E. Capuano, D-Mass., a member of the House Transportation Committee.

Dipping into the transportation fund raised concerns among some community leaders.

"One always hopes that the end is in sight for the Big Dig, and it seems like there's light at the end of the tunnel, but the tunnel seems to be getting longer," said Geoffrey Beckwith, executive director of the Massachusetts Municipal Association. "There's a huge backlog of state projects. ... This can't be good news."

Meanwhile, some completion schedules for the project have been pushed back.

Substantial completion of the project which was scheduled for Thursday has been pushed back to Oct. 31. And all roadwork connected with the project won't be finished until May 31 of next year.

Officials blamed various construction problems for the completion delays.

boston.com

© Copyright 2005 The New York Times Company



To: BEEF JERKEY who wrote (703040)9/21/2005 6:15:25 PM
From: George Coyne  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
"Art" is in the eye of the individual, NOT the government!