Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: trouthead who wrote (703272)	9/22/2005 12:45:33 PM
From: CYBERKEN	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Neither you nor Durbandick are qualified to speak about American troops. That is reserved for Americans...

To: trouthead who wrote (703272)	9/22/2005 12:45:56 PM
From: DizzyG	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Interesting... Saying that fewer soldiers will die if the war ends sooner than later is a fact, not a straw argument. Sure it is...you pulled the troop numbers out of your hat. Your purpose in making these numbers up is to strengthen your argument. You have no proof that these skewed numbers are legitimate. The sedition Act of 1918 is the most un-american piece of legislation I have ever read. I disagree. BTW, here is a site you may wish to explore... seconddraft.org After reviewing this site, I couldn't help but wonder if the same propaganda techniques are being used in Iraq. As to whether the remarks of Durbin rise even close to the fascist Sedition Act would depend on what's going on at Gitmo. So you are good with the comparison to Nazi prison camps? How do you think this type of rhetoric impacts are enemies? Better yet, how do you think it impacts our own troops? Do you think this type of rhetoric has a caused the death of US soldiers? Diz-