SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: John Vosilla who wrote (41829)9/22/2005 1:38:34 PM
From: patron_anejo_por_favorRespond to of 306849
 
We'll see....a lot is going to depend on forward speed of the storm from here on out. Faster=closer to Houston, slower=closer to Port Arthur/Beaumont. Hopefully the latter will be evacuated, we haven't heard much about that in the mainstream news, but they could catch the brunt of this. In an earlier post on the hurricane thread I described that as "2nd worse scenario" from the standpoint of energy infrastructure damage, due to refineries there....



To: John Vosilla who wrote (41829)9/22/2005 2:05:19 PM
From: patron_anejo_por_favorRespond to of 306849
 
We'll see....a lot is going to depend on forward speed of the storm from here on out. Faster=closer to Houston, slower=closer to Port Arthur/Beaumont. Hopefully the latter will be evacuated, we haven't heard much about that in the mainstream news, but they could catch the brunt of this. In an earlier post I described that as "2nd worse scenario" from the standpoint of energy infrastructure damage, due to refineries there. In fact, Beaumont/Port Arthur/West Lousiana has nearly as much refinery capacity as the Houston metro area (though it's a bit more widely dispersed):

calculatedrisk.blogspot.com

Beaumont Exxon-Mobil refinery (348,500 bpd):

maps.google.com

Conoco Phillips-Westlake, LA (239,000 Bpd)

maps.google.com

Citgo Lake Charles, LA (324,300 bpd):

maps.google.com