Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dan B. who wrote (67582)	9/26/2005 11:07:58 PM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 81568

Good to see you critical of Bush. Everyone should be. if you're a loyal Republican, fine, but your Grand Ole Party deserves a lot better. I would recommend you look into Chuck Hagel. He is one of the only Repubs who has tried to tell the truth, bucking the Bushies to do so. That takes courage. What we need in our leaders is honesty and courage. The two most important qualities.

To: Dan B. who wrote (67582)	9/27/2005 12:47:16 PM
From: ChinuSFO	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 81568

He does the republican party a bit of a disservice with his poor presence and command of the language. I think he should not be judged by that. He is OK as far as communication is concerned. He speak in simple sentences and I think there is nothing wrong with that. In fact that is considered an asset in politics. What I have problems with is that he is not an original thinker. He is not that brilliant as Clinton was. Not sure if you heard Clinton's reason on why FEMA failed in NO. He defended ex-FEMA chief Brown in a benign way. He said that it was the organization wherein FEMA was included under Homeland Security that was to blame. And I wonder why Bush cannot display that foresight, that sort of a vision for this country whether it is a vision for Social Security or Medicare drug program etc.