SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: cirrus who wrote (704162)9/27/2005 11:47:59 AM
From: JDN  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
I know nothing about NO's or Louisianna, BUT around here if you were 9 ft. below sea level I am sure you would be considered to be in a flood plain and should have been REQUIRED to have flood insurance. I bet you will find those people with the million $$ homes DO HAVE adequate insurance, its the unwashed masses that may have not had insurance if they did not have a debt on the property thus forcing them to be adequately insured. I have HEARD (dont know if its true) that its AGAINST THE LAW for the FEDERAL govt to pay for the cost to rebuild any home. jdn



To: cirrus who wrote (704162)9/27/2005 12:14:46 PM
From: Thomas A Watson  Respond to of 769670
 
The time to discuss the meanings of words is before the flood or wind. Flood insurance for the dictionary meaning of water all over the place was available. Changing accepted meanings after the fact is fraud and theft. I don't my insurance premiums going up to pay for others fraud and theft.

Honest and fair are simple ideas.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News