SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (704427)9/28/2005 11:15:12 AM
From: DizzyG  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
So what would be the explanation for global warming on Mars?



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (704427)9/28/2005 11:20:30 AM
From: Hope Praytochange  Respond to of 769670
 
kennydemohack: here is your buddy news
Top Brooklyn Democrat Convicted of Campaign Violations
By ANEMONA HARTOCOLLIS
Clarence Norman Jr., the leader of one of the largest Democratic Party organizations in the nation, was found guilty yesterday of soliciting illegal campaign contributions. It was a stark fall from grace for the son of a prominent Brooklyn minister who grew up to practice law and become a consummate insider in New York's political system.

Mr. Norman, 54, the first black Democratic Party leader in Brooklyn, watched, puffy eyed and expressionless, his hands clasped in front of him, as the jury of three men and nine women in State Supreme Court pronounced the guilty verdict on three felony counts and one misdemeanor count at 4:15 p.m., one day after deliberations began.

Mr. Norman faces up to eight years in prison, according to the prosecution. Sentencing was set for Nov. 29. The lead prosecutor, Michael F. Vecchione, also said the law called for him to be immediately stripped of his Assembly seat and his license to practice law.

The jury forewoman dabbed at her eyes before reading the verdict, and the rest of the jury, which was made up of seven blacks, one Hispanic and four whites, looked downcast as they were polled one by one by the court clerk and confirmed the verdict.

One juror, Sarah Lariviere, 30, said Mr. Norman's testimony that he had made mistakes had not been convincing. "I don't think that worked in his favor, particularly, because there seemed to be a pattern of the same mistake over and over and to call it a mistake doesn't seem like a convincing explanation," she said. Asked if she thought Mr. Norman had lied, as the prosecution contended, she said, "I can't think of a particular scenario where it sounded like he was lying, but there were many things that he seemed not to remember."

Ms. Lariviere said the jury was in agreement almost from the beginning, although the verdict was hard on them emotionally. "I think that a lot of people's personal feelings were sadness," she said. "But we made a real effort to follow the judge's instructions and call sadness sadness or emotions, and then just look at the facts."

The case pitted Mr. Norman, an assemblyman for 23 years and the powerful leader of the Brooklyn Democratic organization since 1990, against a political opponent, Charles J. Hynes, the Brooklyn district attorney for 16 years, who won a highly contested primary election two weeks ago, just as the trial was getting under way.

Mr. Hynes, another Democratic Party insider, had vowed to crack down on political corruption in his borough, while Mr. Norman had denounced the prosecution as a political witch hunt.

Mr. Norman was accused of soliciting contributions totaling $7,423.30 in 2000 and $5,400 in 2002 from Ralph Bombardiere, a lobbyist for 3,500 retail gas stations and repair shops, knowing that the amounts exceeded state limits. There was no allegation that Mr. Norman had pocketed the money, but the prosecution said that it was used to pay expenses for the primary elections, like printing and shopping bags.

But the prosecution contended that Mr. Norman tried to conceal the contributions because he knew they exceeded the $3,100 allowed by state law, and made much of the fact that he was deputy speaker of the Assembly, "a favorite son of Brooklyn," who had, in the prosecutor's words, "sacrificed his integrity" to win an election.

Mr. Norman did not appear to help his case when he took the stand in his own defense and offered a rambling, forgetful version of events. He was found guilty of two felony counts of violating New York State campaign laws by soliciting illegal contributions in his 2000 and 2002 primary campaigns, and one felony and one misdemeanor count of falsifying business records of those contributions.

Outside the courtroom afterward, Mr. Norman was stoic. "We just have to move forward," he said. "We have other cases we have to deal with." He faces three more indictments on corruption charges, also brought by Mr. Hynes, on charges that he misused campaign funds, double-dipped for $5,000 in travel expenses, and strong-armed judicial candidates into hiring consultants for the party.

Mr. Norman's father, the Rev. Clarence Norman Sr., and his mother, Ellen, were sitting in the second row of the courtroom yesterday, surrounded by members of Mr. Norman Sr.'s church, the First Baptist Church of Crown Heights. "Well, you know the verdict is hard as a father," the minister said. "I've been a pastor of a church for 52 years. I'm 78 years old. I have been up and I have been down. My life goes on. The Lord never fails. This too will work out."

Mr. Norman's lawyer, Edward Rappaport, said he was exploring his options and could file a motion to set aside the verdict, perhaps based on the concept that Mr. Norman could not defraud the business records of his own campaign committee.

Mr. Norman is the latest in a line of party chiefs, going back to William Marcy Tweed in the 19th century, to face allegations of official corruption. One of his predecessors in Brooklyn, Meade H. Esposito, was convicted in a 1988 influence peddling scandal. Donald R. Manes, the Queens party boss, killed himself with a kitchen knife in 1986 after being caught up in a contract-rigging scheme. A Bronx Republican leader, former State Senator Guy J. Velella, was sentenced to a year in jail in 2004 for bribery conspiracy.

The case against Mr. Norman began as an investigation into claims that judgeships were for sale in Brooklyn, where the Democratic nomination is tantamount to winning election, and Democratic Party leaders like Mr. Norman were said to be able to dictate the outcome of judicial elections. But in the end, the investigation of Mr. Norman led in a different direction, to his own campaign finances.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (704427)9/28/2005 11:42:01 AM
From: goldworldnet  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
For over 15 years, the UN-based Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has been the leading scientific proponent of global warming theory. But last year, two respected researchers have largely discredited the IPCC's global warming predictions.

IPCC scenarios are based on the assumption that increasing levels of carbon dioxide will eventually turn the Earth into a tropical greenhouse. But Ian Castles, an Australian statistician, and David Henderson, a British economist, revealed that the IPCC's estimates of future carbon dioxide emissions take off from flawed and vastly overstated economic projections.

As it turns out, over the years the IPCC has based its climate change models on simplistic estimates of GDP growth in various countries. Essentially, panel scientists have gotten away with using currency exchange rates -- a value in U.S. dollars -- to predict and total a projected output for the world's disparate economies.

Of course, this produces results which favor the panel's perhaps preordained conclusions. But the researchers point out that the sleight-of-hand substitution is invalid. Serious scientific economists use "purchasing power parity" (PPP) to compare and project national economies.

PPP is the accepted method used by the World Bank, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, and the United Nations. But by ignoring purchasing power parity, the IPCC was able to project hyper-inflated levels of economic growth -- and consequently carbon emissions -- in the developing world.

The resulting projections are frankly absurd. Playing the IPCC's own number game, by the end of this century, the per capita income of South Africans will be four times higher than that of Americans. North Koreans, Libyans, Algerians and Argentines will also have higher real per capita incomes than the United States. Except for "proving" global warming, the IPCC method just doesn't work. It's an obvious distortion.

In 2003, not only were IPCC's growth estimates fundamentally discredited, but global warming theory itself has just about fallen off its foundation.

"Scientific" proponents of global warming now base much of their case on a 1998 study by climatologist Michael Mann purporting to show that Earth's temperatures were stable for a millennium, and then suddenly spiked in the late 1900s.

Mann's "hockey stick" graph of climate data shows world temperatures in the second half of the 20th century as the highest on record in the last 1,000 years.

Mann and his report achieved celebrity status despite the fact that, since its publication, it's been repeatedly contradicted by geologists who have discovered both a warm period and mini ice age over the past millennium. Nonetheless, Mann's "hockey stick" has become the single-most prominent graphic depiction -- and implied proof -- of global warming

But this October, Mann's theory was clobbered in peer review. A paper in the prestigious British journal Energy & Environment revealed Mann's original study to be rife with "collation errors ... obsolete data, incorrect calculation ... and other quality-control defects." And the beat goes on.

Two Canadian statisticians, Stephen McIntyre and Ross McKitrick, recalculated Mann's data with the corrections put in, and found that the late 20th century was not particularly warm after all. Indeed, they found that around the 1500s the world was warmer than it was in the 20th century. So much for industrialization as a sole and compelling cause.

So, in a nutshell, the leading scientific study supporting global warming has been thoroughly debunked. Even Nature magazine, which published Mann's original findings in 1998, is now reportedly reviewing Mann's underlying data.

techcentralstation.com

* * *