SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Lake New Orleans -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Rande Is who wrote (966)9/28/2005 8:06:58 PM
From: paret  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1118
 
Red Cross Criticized, Urged to Share Cash
Associated Press ^ | 9/28/05 | DAVID CRARY

As its hurricane relief donations near the $1 billion mark, more than double all other charities combined, the American Red Cross is encountering sharp criticism of its efforts and mounting pressure to share funds with smaller groups.

The complaints — that Red Cross operations were chaotic in some places, inequitable in others — have stung deeply within an organization that is proud of its overall response to Hurricane Katrina, by far the most devastating natural disaster it has confronted on U.S. soil.

"It's frustrating to our thousands of volunteers out there every day, away from their families, helping people," said spokeswoman Devorah Goldburg. "We never said we were perfect — we're trying to do our best under extraordinary circumstances."

The frustration stems partly from the fact that the Red Cross has worked to avoid a recurrence of the humbling fundraising controversy that flared after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.

Back then, the Red Cross raised about $1.1 billion — its record so far for a single disaster — but the organization was assailed when donors belatedly learned that $200 million of their gifts were being earmarked to prepare for future crises rather than to help victims. Red Cross president Bernadine Healy resigned, the money was shifted back to the Sept. 11 Liberty Fund, and the organization promised greater accountability in future fundraising campaigns.

Because of that experience, Goldburg said the Red Cross is determined to use its massive donations for purposes its donors were asked to support. These include emergency shelter and food, plus short-term financial aid, but not longer-term recovery or rebuilding. Such efforts have never been part of the Red Cross mission.

"After 9/11, we learned we had to be very specific as to where our money is going," Goldburg said. "Our donors are saying to us, 'We want this money spent on Katrina right now.'"

The Red Cross estimates it will need $2 billion to finance Katrina-related emergency services. Even if the goal is reached, Goldburg said, any policy change that would allow support of recovery programs would have to be authorized by the Red Cross board of governors.

Paul Light, a professor of public service at New York University, said he has been impressed with the Red Cross' adjustments after Sept. 11 and its emergency response to Katrina.

But he is among numerous experts and activists who believe Katrina's impact is so severe that the Red Cross should depart from tradition and help finance the long-term recovery. "A lot of small non-profits in the Gulf Coast are staring at deficits and will be hoping for partnerships," he said. "The Red Cross would be wise to invest in them."

Kathleen McCarthy, director of the Center for the Study of Philanthropy at the City University of New York, also advised the Red Cross to consider flexible, creative ways of sharing donations.

"How funds are allocated between relief and development is always a problem because relief is sexy and development is not," she said. "We're seeing a huge amount of money poured into relief, and far less attention paid to how you get money to local organizations which can find the best way to help rebuild their communities."

Across the Gulf Coast, a coalition of black-led community groups called Saving Our Selves is urging the Red Cross to consult with their leaders as attention shifts to recovery.

"This work is so immense — it's dangerous any time you have a single organization monopolizing relief services," said coalition leader LaTosha Brown. "The Red Cross needs to recognize its limitations and reach out by partnering with local agencies who have people on the ground."

Yet the executive director of the watchdog group Charity Navigator said such pleas to the Red Cross are unrealistic, and many reflect envy of its fund-raising prowess.

"The Red Cross raised the money fair and square by making a compelling case to the American public that they were the best organization to get these dollars," Trent Stamp said. "To come in after the fact and ask them to share the money — I can't think of anything more pie-in-the-sky and naive."

Several other complaints have arisen. Among them:

_Some black activists have contended that the Red Cross response, notably in the first few days after Katrina, provided better services in mostly white areas than mostly black areas. "For the first 72 hours, they did not do an equitable job of responding to all communities," said Joe Leonard of the Washington-based Black Leadership Forum.

Red Cross chief diversity officer Rick Pogue said this perception arose because the organization, though committed to serving all in need, had more trouble getting teams into some impoverished black areas early in the crisis than into more affluent areas. "The need was so great, we'd go first to the areas we could get to the easiest," Pogue said.

_In DeKalb County, Ga., the Red Cross was asked to vacate a relief center still filled with hundreds of Katrina evacuees after a dispute with the county's chief executive. Goldburg said the dispute involved financing; DeKalb County CEO Vernon Jones said victims were "treated like cattle" by overwhelmed volunteers unprepared to handle the demand for services.

_Many people seeking help complained of trying futilely for hours to get through to Red Cross telephone hot lines. The Red Cross acknowledged this problem and appealed for patience.

_Richard Walden, president of the relief agency Operation USA, urged donors to consider alternatives to the Red Cross in a scathing column Sunday in the Los Angeles Times titled "The Red Cross Money Pit." Among other charges, Walden said the Red Cross had not made clear to donors that some of its spending on emergency housing for evacuees would be reimbursed by the federal government.

Goldburg said such reimbursements — for evacuees placed in motels when Red Cross shelters became overcrowded — would amount to a little less than $100 million, or 5 percent of the organization's projected total costs.



To: Rande Is who wrote (966)9/28/2005 8:10:48 PM
From: paret  Respond to of 1118
 
According to Forbes, the RED CROSS CEO, Marsha Evans, was paid $651,957 in 2003.

forbes.com



To: Rande Is who wrote (966)9/30/2005 12:18:31 PM
From: Oeconomicus  Respond to of 1118
 
Good response, Rande.

BTW, here's an LA Times article on the media's coverage of Katrina, as reprinted in the AJC. IMO, not only did such irresponsible coverage damage the image of NOLA (not that it needed help in having a bad reputation), but it also 1) contributed significantly to the difficulty of the rescue and relief effort; 2) stirred up a nationwide bout of open partisan hostility; 3) stirred up racial tensions by making it appear i) that no one cared enough to try to help poor blacks in NO and ii) that the poor blacks themselves were little more than animals fighting with each other over the means of survival rather than helping each other as best they could in a bad situation; and 4) painted a severely biased picture of what was going on there that unjustifiably damaged public confidence in the federal government to come to the aid of local authorities in emergencies. Never, in all the TV coverage from the SuperDome, did I see even a hint that this National Guard officer, Maj. Ed Bush, and his unit were anywhere near the dome until the people there were already heading out in numbers on buses. It was all "we reporters are here risking our lives to cover this and help people - where is the government?" Well, apparently just off camera. Except, of course, for Nagin and other local officials who were ON camera elsewhere feeding the fear and hype.

HURRICANES' AFTERMATH: Post-hurricane tales of anarchy lack credibility
Phone outage is blamed for false reports
Susannah Rosenblatt, James Rainey - Los Angeles Times
Friday, September 30, 2005

Baton Rouge, La. --- Maj. Ed Bush recalled how he stood in the bed of a pickup truck in the days following Hurricane Katrina, struggling to help the vast crowd outside the Louisiana Superdome separate fact from fiction. Armed only with a megaphone and scant information, he might have been shouting into, well, a hurricane.

The National Guard spokesman's accounts of rescue efforts, water supplies and first aid all but disappeared amid the roar of a 24-hour rumor mill at New Orleans' main evacuation shelter. Then a frenzied media recycled and amplified many of the unverified reports.

"It just morphed into this mythical place where the most unthinkable deeds were being done," Bush said this week of the Superdome. His assessment is one of several in recent days to conclude that newspapers and television exaggerated criminal behavior after Hurricane Katrina, particularly at the overcrowded Superdome and Convention Center.

The New Orleans Times-Picayune on Monday described inflated body counts, unverified rapes and unconfirmed sniper attacks as among examples of "scores of myths about the Dome and Convention Center treated as fact by evacuees, the media and even some of New Orleans' top officials."

Indeed, Mayor C. Ray Nagin told a national television audience on "The Oprah Winfrey Show" three weeks ago of people "in that frickin' Superdome for five days watching dead bodies, watching hooligans killing people, raping people."

Lack of communication

Journalists and officials who have reviewed the Katrina disaster blamed the inaccurate reporting in large measure on the breakdown of telephone service, which prevented dissemination of accurate reports to those most in need of the information. Race also may have played a factor.

The wild rumors filled the vacuum and seemed to gain credence with each retelling --- that an infant's body had been found in a trash can, that sharks from Lake Pontchartrain were swimming through the business district, that hundreds of bodies had been stacked in the Superdome basement.

Follow-up reporting has now discredited reports of a 7-year-old being raped and killed at the Convention Center, roving bands of armed gang members attacking the helpless, and dozens of bodies being shoved into a freezer at the Convention Center.

Hyperbolic reporting spread through much of the media. Fox News, a day before the major evacuation of the Superdome began, issued an "alert" as talk host Alan Colmes reiterated reports of "robberies, rapes, carjackings, riots and murder. Violent gangs are roaming the streets at night, hidden by the cover of darkness."

The Los Angeles Times adopted much the same tone the next day in its lead news story, reporting that National Guard troops "took positions on rooftops, scanning for snipers and armed mobs as seething crowds of refugees milled below, desperate to flee. Gunfire crackled in the distance."

The New York Times repeated some of the same reports of violence and unrest, although the newspaper usually was more careful to note that the information could not be verified.

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution focused on reports of looting and how authorities tried to deal with it. New Orleans Police Chief Eddie Compass, who has since resigned, told the newspaper that individuals were being raped and beaten.

Televised images and photographs affirmed the widespread devastation in one of America's most celebrated cities.

"I don't think you can overstate how big of a disaster New Orleans is," said Kelly McBride, ethics group leader at the Poynter Institute, a Florida school for professional journalists. "But you can imprecisely state the nature of the disaster. ... Then you draw attention away from the real story, the magnitude of the destruction and you kind of undermine the media's credibility."

Times-Picayune Editor Jim Amoss cited telephone breakdowns as a primary cause of reporting errors, but he said the fact that most evacuees were poor blacks also played a part.

"If the Dome and Convention Center had harbored large numbers of middle-class white people," Amoss said, "it would not have been a fertile ground for this kind of rumor-mongering."

Death toll short of reports

State officials this week said their counts of the dead at the city's two largest evacuation points fell far short of early rumors and news reports. Ten bodies were recovered from the Superdome and four from the Convention Center, said Bob Johannessen, spokesman for the Louisiana Department of Health & Hospitals.

Of the 864 recorded hurricane-related deaths in Louisiana, four are identified as gunshot victims, Johannessen said.

The New Orleans Police Department launched an investigation Thursday into whether some of its officers participated in the giant looting spree that overtook the city, as some media reported.

The media inaccuracies had consequences in the disaster zone.

Bush, the National Guard spokesman, said reports of corpses at the Superdome filtered back to the facility via AM radio, undermining his struggle to keep morale up and maintain order.

"We had to convince people this was still the best place to be," Bush said. "What I saw in the Superdome was just tremendous amounts of people helping people."

But, Bush said, those stories received scant attention in some newspapers or on television.

-Information from The Associated Press contributed to this article.
ajc.com