SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bill who wrote (704574)9/28/2005 3:35:25 PM
From: pompsander  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Here is a link to the indictment. Interesting reading..

Message 21745279



To: Bill who wrote (704574)9/28/2005 3:35:32 PM
From: PROLIFE  Respond to of 769670
 
According to the news, the indictment says very little...only the weakest of indictments...conspiracy.



To: Bill who wrote (704574)9/28/2005 3:53:59 PM
From: cirrus  Respond to of 769670
 
The indictment accuses DeLay and two alleged co-conspirators, John Colyandro and Jim Ellis, of engaging in a scheme to launder $190,000 in corporate donations through the Republican National Committee for distribution to Republican candidates for the Texas Legislature.

Texas law generally prohibits corporate money from being used for campaign activities.



To: Bill who wrote (704574)9/28/2005 3:54:44 PM
From: paret  Respond to of 769670
 
MSNBC Cuts-off Delay During Statement
PMSNBC | 9/28/05

During Delay's statement on his indictment by Presecutor Earle, MSNBC cut away for some "analysis."

MSNBC had plenty of time to broadcast Earle * but somehow not enough for Delay's reply.



To: Bill who wrote (704574)9/28/2005 4:00:33 PM
From: paret  Respond to of 769670
 
Mark Levin on DeLay
National Review Online ^ | 9/28/05 | Mark R. Levin

DELAY [Mark R. Levin] Here's my first take on this indictment (I've only read the indictment and nothing more for now): The indictment is three pages in length. Other than a statement that "one or more" of 3 individuals, including Tom DeLay, entered into an illegal conspiracy, I can't find a single sentence tying Tom DeLay to a crime. That is, there's not a single sentence tying DeLay to the contribution. The indictment describes the alleged conduct of two other individuals, but nothing about DeLay.

You would think if Ronnie Earle had even a thin reed of testimony linking DeLay to the contribution, it would have been noted in the indictment to justify the grand jury's action.

Moreover, not only is there no information about DeLay committing acts in furtherance of a conspiracy, there's no information about DeLay entering into a conspiracy.

I honestly believe that unless there's more, this is an egregious abuse of prosecutorial power. It's a disgrace. I understand that not everything has to be contained in an indictment, but how about something! Posted at 01:58 PM



To: Bill who wrote (704574)9/28/2005 4:08:35 PM
From: paret  Respond to of 769670
 
DELAY LAWYER: 'INDICTMENT IS LIKE A DEAD SKUNK IN THE MIDDLE OF THE ROAD, AND IT STINKS TO HIGH HEAVEN'...



To: Bill who wrote (704574)9/28/2005 4:18:20 PM
From: paret  Respond to of 769670
 
Text of DeLay press statement
Kansas City Star ^ | 9-28-05 | AP

Associated Press

Text of remarks by House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, R-Texas, on Wednesday, as transcribed by DeLay's office:

__

DELAY: Good morning. Thank you for attending.

This morning, in an act of blatant political partisanship, a rogue district attorney in Travis County, Texas named Ronnie Earle charged me with one count of criminal conspiracy, a reckless charge wholly unsupported by the facts.

This is one of the weakest, most baseless indictments in American history.

It is a sham, and Mr. Earle knows it.

It is a charge that can not hold up even under the most glancing scrutiny.

This act is the product of a coordinated, premeditated campaign of political retribution, the all-too-predictable result of a vengeful investigation led by a partisan fanatic.

Mr. Earle is abusing the power of his office to exact personal revenge for the role I played in the Texas Republican legislative campaign in 2002 and my advocacy for a new, fair and constitutional congressional map for our state in 2003.

As it turned out, those efforts were successful.

Texas Republicans did indeed win a legislative majority.

A fair and representative congressional map was drawn and approved by the legislature.

And the Texas congressional delegation now, after the 2004 elections, fairly represents the values and attitudes of the state.

Over the course of this long and bitter political battle, it became clear that the retribution for our success would be ferocious.

Today, that retribution is being exacted.

Mr. Earle, an unabashed partisan zealot with a well-documented history of launching baseless investigations and indictments against his political enemies, has been targeting a political action committee on whose advisory board I once served.

During his investigation, he has gone out of his way to give several media interviews in his office - the only days he actually comes to the office, I'm told - in which he has singled me out for personal attacks, in direct violation of his public responsibility to conduct an impartial inquiry.

Despite his long-standing animosity toward me - and the abusive investigation that animosity has unfortunately rendered - as recently as two weeks ago, Mr. Earle himself publicly admitted I had never been a focus or target of his inquiry.

Soon thereafter, Mr. Earle's hometown newspaper ran a biting editorial about his investigation, rhetorically asking what the point had been, after all, if I wasn't to be indicted.

It was this renewed political pressure in the waning days of his hollow investigation that led this morning's action.

In accordance with the rules of the House Republican Conference, I will temporarily step aside as floor leader in order to win exoneration from these baseless charges.

Let me be very, very clear. I have done nothing wrong.

I have violated no law, no regulation, no rule of the House.

I have done nothing unlawful, unethical, or, I might add, unprecedented even in the political campaigns of Mr. Earle himself.

My defense in this case will not be technical or legalistic: it will be categorical and absolute.

I am innocent. Mr. Earle and his staff know it. And I will prove it.

Here in Washington, there is work - hard, hard work - ahead of our conference.

We have a war to win, a region to rebuild, a budget to balance, taxes to cut, a government to reform, and a nation to lead.

In coming weeks, the House is committed to major legislation reforming our border security and immigration laws, alleviating the rising costs of gasoline and heating fuel before the winter, and saving tens of billions of dollars through reforming federal entitlement programs.

My job right now is to serve my constituents and our nation in support of this ambitious and needed agenda.

As for the charges, I have the facts, the law, and the truth on my side - just as I have against every false allegation my opponents have flung at me over the years.

Once exposed to the light of objective scrutiny, every one of their frivolous accusations against me has been dismissed, and so will Mr. Earle's.

Thank you very much for this opportunity to speak with you today.

END



To: Bill who wrote (704574)9/28/2005 4:36:39 PM
From: paret  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
DELAY'S INDICTMENT [Mark R. Levin]
National Review Online ^ | 9/28/05 | Mark R. Levin

The "facts" in the indictment do not make a case for illegal contributions by the corporations because the indictment doesn't even allege that the corporate contributions were made within 60 days of an election. The essential argument is that a contribution was made to the RNC from a Texas PAC, which had received these corporate contributions (the dates of which we don't know), and certain candidates in Texas received money (presumably from the RNC), although not necessarily tracking with the corporate contributions to the PAC. If this sounds convoluted, it is.

Based on this information, I see no illegal contribution, let alone no tie to Tom DeLay.

I also note that none of the corporations that made contributions have been indicted. (And, by the way, the Texas conspiracy statute requires evidence that those charged actually intended to commit a crime. So, the bar for the government is significant.)

The more I analyze this, the more outrageous this appears. I only hope the mainstream media will do a better job reporting on this than on Hurricane Katrina. Posted at 03:47 PM