SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: abstract who wrote (62634)9/29/2005 1:44:07 AM
From: Sully-  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 65232
 
I wonder why the MSM is so completely silent about a genuine
scandal involving the Democratic Senatorial Campaign
Committee, where there is irrefutable proof that a crime has
been committed?

The Democrats go dumpster diving

By Michelle Malkin

Have you heard about what New York Sen. Charles Schumer's meddling minions tried to do here in my home state of Maryland to embarrass a Republican opponent?

Don't bother with The New York Times if you want details. Since revelations of the scandal first broke a week ago on the national wires and in the rest of the New York media, the Times has failed to print a single word about the Dems' invasive — and obviously illegal — dumpster diving.

Republican Lt. Gov. Michael Steele, a rising star in the party, is considering a Senate bid for the Maryland seat being vacated by Democrat Paul Sarbanes next year. Apparently threatened by the prospect of a strong, popular, black Republican candidate, the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee got down and dirty. Two of Schumer's staffers on the committee, including a former top researcher for David Brock's left-wing "think tank," obtained Steele's confidential credit report by using his Social Security number, which they had reportedly culled from court records.

Under federal law, it is illegal to knowingly and willfully obtain a credit report under false pretenses. The federal Fair Credit Reporting Act imposes a maximum two-year prison sentence for the crime.

Democrat spinners would have you believe that the two staffers involved in the apparent fraud, Katie Barge and Lauren Weiner, were young and inexperienced workers. They're soft-pedaling the incident as an "isolated" occurrence on par with a high school prank. But Barge has been around the block, including stints as a researcher for Sen. John Edwards' failed presidential bid and as research director for Brock's Media Matters for America.

The two henchladies reportedly owned up to the act in July, were suspended with pay until Aug. 31, as the New York Post's Deborah Orin reported, and resigned earlier this month. Their dealings are being investigated by the fraud and public corruption section of the U.S. attorney's office in Washington, D.C., with help from the FBI — which, according to Steele's staff, told the lieutenant governor that he was an obvious "victim of a crime."

Law enforcement officials are taking this criminal intrusion into private records deadly seriously. But left-wing partisans are nowhere to be found. Steele's staff tells me that longtime crusader against identity theft Sen. Schumer, who denies having any knowledge of the scheme, has still issued no apology for the abuse of Steele's personal data. And there has been no outcry from the ACLU, the champions of clean campaigns, or any major national newspaper editorial board.


(Protecting privacy only seems to matter to liberals when it comes to 14-year-old girls seeking abortions behind their parents' backs, illegal aliens seeking sanctuary from the police, and registered sex offenders objecting to community registration requirements.)

Needless to say, if it had been Republicans involved in this outrageous breach of privacy and the target had been a liberal minority politician, it would be front-page news. When asked by readers why the Times had not covered the story, ombudsman Byron Calame's office sent this obnoxious reply:


<<<

Dear Reader,

Thanks for writing and raising this issue. This office has no control over what is printed in the paper. It seems your message would be better directed to news-tips@nytimes.com.
>>>

The Times, it should be noted, is the same paper that happily received and printed a front-page story about an illegally obtained tape recording of a conference call with Republican leaders in 1996 that was leaked by Democrat Rep. Jim McDermott of Washington. McDermott's leak was condemned by U.S. District Court Judge Thomas Hogan last year as "willful and knowing misconduct [that] rises to the level of malice in this case." McDermott is busy raising money from lobbyists for his defense fund — a violation of House rules that the Times' ethics mavens have blithely ignored.

Jaded journalists will shrug off what conservative author and talk show host Hugh Hewitt has dubbed "Chuckaquiddick" by arguing that "everybody does it." If that is so, they should be leading the charge to find out who else at the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee has been doing it. And to whom they have been doing it.

jewishworldreview.com



To: abstract who wrote (62634)9/29/2005 5:08:14 PM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 65232
 
While the MSM, DNC & left wingers like you are hysterical
with glee over the misperception of corruption run amok in
the GOP, Dems that are actually committing real crimes get
ZERO MSM coverage.

I guess that your fervent belief that "perception is more
important than reality" is pretty widespread among libs.

Via Betsy's Page:

And the Democrats might want to rethink having Nancy Pelosi being their point person on going after DeLay since she has her own ethics problems with the campaign finance laws.

<<<

IRONICALLY, DELAY'S DEMOCRATIC counterpart in the House, Nancy Pelosi, has been involved in wholesale and indisputable election law violations, but has been absent from the headlines. Pelosi is a champion of what is called "campaign finance reform." The clearest and most fundamental tenet of current election law is the limitation of contributions. Yet, Pelosi's committees have engaged in a massive circumvention of the limitation, even as Pelosi was a key player in passing additional "reform" measures such as McCain-Feingold.

Earlier this year, the Federal Election Commission fined two so-called leadership PACs associated with Pelosi in response to a Complaint by the National Legal and Policy Center. The purpose of leadership PACs is to make contributions to the campaigns of other Congressional candidates. House and Senate Leaders are allowed one leadership PAC in addition to their own campaign committee.

Pelosi set up two. Her second PAC made $5,000 contributions to thirty-six campaigns that had already received the $5,000 maximum from the first. The treasurer of both PACs candidly admitted that the "main reason" for setting up the second PAC was to "give twice as much (sic) hard dollars."
>>>

Sounds like a conspiracy to break the campaign finance laws, doesn't it?

I think one thing we can all agree on is that these laws are way too complicated and that everyone has found a way around them. I'd like to scrap all of them and just require every politician, PAC, or outsider group to post online immediately who donated how much to their campaigns. If the goal is to keep money out of politics, McCain-Feingold is a "miserable failure."

betsyspage.blogspot.com

spectator.org



To: abstract who wrote (62634)9/29/2005 9:38:12 PM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 65232
 
"Going Down ?"

About Those "Ethics Woes"

Power Line
<snip>

For those who haven't seen Frist's side of the story--like, if you've been reading the newspapers--here is his account of the HCA stock sale and related events; the real moral of the story is, no good deed goes unpunished:
    When deciding how to handle my family's personal 
investments, I always sought expert advice and Senate
Ethics Committee review and approval. Despite not being
required to do so, I sought and obtained two Ethics
Committee opinions acknowledging that my ownership of HCA
stock complied with Senate rules and did not present a
conflict of interest with my Senate duties. Despite not
being required to do so, I later chose to place many of
my investments in blind trusts, including my HCA stock.
With these efforts, I have sought to guarantee that no
conflict of interest existed. Review after review has
found nothing wrong. Nevertheless, the complaints and
questions have persisted.
    Because of these continuing questions, and looking ahead 
at my final years in the Senate and what might come next,
I have for some time wanted to eliminate even the
possibility of an appearance of a conflict by totally
divesting of any HCA stock in my family's trusts.
    In April, I asked my staff to determine if Senate rules 
and relevant laws would allow me to direct the trustees
to sell any remaining HCA stock. After my staff reviewed
relevant statutes and Senate rules and consulted with
outside counsel and Senate Ethics Committee staff, I
learned that the rules allowed me to direct the trustees
to sell any remaining HCA stock in my blind trusts.
    In May, my staff worked with outside counsel and the 
Senate Ethics Committee staff to draft a written
communication to the trustees. After obtaining pre-
approval by mid-June from the Senate Ethics Committee, I
issued a letter directing my trustees to sell any
remaining HCA stock in my family's trusts.

    Now I am being asked to explain this decision. I 
understand that. And I welcome it.
    An examination of the facts will demonstrate that I acted 
properly. I will cooperate with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC) and the U.S. Attorney for the
Southern District of New York to provide the information
they need as quickly as possible. My only objective in
selling the stock was to eliminate the appearance of a
conflict of interest. I had no information about HCA or
its performance that was not publicly available when I
directed the trustees to sell the stock.
How unethical can you get?

powerlineblog.com

frist.senate.gov



To: abstract who wrote (62634)9/29/2005 9:42:42 PM
From: Sully-  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 65232
 
Tell me this isn't all about the politics of personal destruction.

“Republicans in Washington D.C. are plagued by a culture of corruption. An ethical cloud hangs over the Capitol. The House Republican Leader has been indicted, the Senate Republican Leader is under investigation, the President’s chief political adviser is under investigation, the White House’s chief procurement officer was arrested last week, and the web that entangles the Republicans in the House, the Senate, and in the White House, Jack Abramoff, has been investigated and indicted. This culture or corruption must stop.

Nancy Pelosi - House Democratic Leader - from her house.gov website.


democraticleader.house.gov



To: abstract who wrote (62634)9/29/2005 9:45:54 PM
From: Sully-  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 65232
 
Yup, guilty before they're proven innocent.

"Today, the state of Texas is doing what the Republican-controlled federal government has failed repeatedly to do, which is to hold Republicans in Washington accountable for their culture of corruption." -- Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean.