SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Epic American Credit and Bond Bubble Laboratory -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Colin H who wrote (42578)9/29/2005 10:41:12 AM
From: regli  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 110194
 
Well, changing the benchmarks is the only thing that even remotely keeps them competitive in the space. This is one desperate company.

However, reinterpreting Moore's law is just too much. What will that chart look like once they drop Itanium?



To: Colin H who wrote (42578)9/29/2005 4:14:46 PM
From: Real Man  Respond to of 110194
 
There is a real problem there - 65 nm is 650 Angstrom. 1 Angstrom
is the size of a typical atom, roughly speaking. The distance
between these is a few Angstrom, say, 3. Just number fluctuation
is a square root of that number, so smaller chips will be
increasingly inaccurate -g-


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News