Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (253304)	9/30/2005 10:01:45 PM
From: steve harris	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1571785

lol... Liberal logic: However, the crime in Clinton's case was an adulterous BJ and he didn't want to have to face his wife with the news. That doesn't change the fact that breaking the law is breaking the law. The average citizen including you and Tom Delay is not in the position where he can decide which law to obey and which one to break. I think you just did.... Ok, liberals get to decide which law to obey and which one to break and average citizens can't. "Elitist"

To: tejek who wrote (253304)	10/1/2005 12:57:39 AM
From: paret	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1571785

Guess which of the 3 had the most press coverage??? ............................................................... Sen Chuck Schumer(D-NY) has 2 staff members caught red-handed illegally acquiring a Republican candidate's credit report. Tom DeLay is indicted by Ronnie Earle. Sen. Harry Reid (D-Nev) is found to have given $300k to a church,and had it "diverted" by a known acquaintence.

To: tejek who wrote (253304)	10/1/2005 4:17:04 AM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1571785

Ted, two contradictions in your post. Steve already brought up the first one (nice, Steve), but here's the second: Yes, but the difference is that there was a real crime behind the perjury charges with Stewart and Lil' Kim......in the case of Lil' Kim, part of the crime was just sheer stupidity......maybe with Stewart too. However, the crime in Clinton's case was an adulterous BJ and he didn't want to have to face his wife with the news. Actually, Clinton's indiscretions were the stupidest of all. Even you'd have a hard time arguing against that. Tenchusatsu

To: tejek who wrote (253304)	10/1/2005 8:51:45 PM
From: brushwud	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1571785

there was a real crime behind the perjury charges with Stewart and Lil' Kim...However, the crime in Clinton's case was an adulterous BJ and he didn't want to have to face his wife with the news. Bill and Hillary had a long-standing arrangement whereby he could have extramarital sex so long as he avoided having illegitimate children. Hence the BJ addiction. The original crime in Clinton's case was the sexual harassment charge brought by Paula Jones. If it had been any other chief executive, of a corporation or a state government, he would've been pilloried and drummed out of office for exposing himself to an employee on the job. And Democrat liberals would've stood up and cheered. Remember what happened to Packwood? Remember what happened to the chairman of Boeing? That would've been Clinton if he had campaigned with an R next to his name. And if Clinton had been convicted, Al Gore would be president today. Think it over.