Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JohnM who wrote (141216)	9/30/2005 11:22:21 PM
From: Carolyn	Respond to of 793957

He was not alone. Many did. Shouldn't they also be at the bottom of the list? You say Nixon's actions are too numerous to list. Why? Give me a hint. And not the usual - Watergate.

To: JohnM who wrote (141216)	9/30/2005 11:29:55 PM
From: briskit	Respond to of 793957

How did he subvert it? Always been curious about it.

To: JohnM who wrote (141216)	10/1/2005 10:58:05 AM
From: briskit	Respond to of 793957

Beginning shortly after (fill in blank) and continuing to the present time, the president has engaged in a series of public statements and actions designed to thwart the lawful investigation by government prosecutors. Moreover, the president has made public announcements and assertions bearing on the (fill in blank) case which the evidence will show he knew to be false. These assertions, false assertions, impeachable, those who misbehave. Those who "behave amiss or betray their public trust." Quiz: about which presidents might such "subversion of the constitution be alleged?" Does this criteria seem uniformly applied? "...members of this committee the glorious opportunity of sharing the pain of this inquiry. It's about politics, not the constitution.