Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: steve harris who wrote (67833)	10/1/2005 8:36:06 PM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 81568

johnkerry.com had all the policy issues listed in detail. Kerry was right on every single issue. Of course even since last year the problems Bushies have created have grown worse, especially the Iraq War and outrageous deficits. Who is going to pay off 7 trillion in new Bush debt? That is the real question. The other big question is how do we get off oil permanently withint 20 years? And off Arab oil within 10 years? Bush-Cheney want us to be slaves of big oil. Kerry had a real plan to start changing all that.

To: steve harris who wrote (67833)	10/2/2005 12:59:36 PM
From: paret	Respond to of 81568

Clinton's failure to grasp the opportunity to unravel increasingly organized extremists, coupled with Berger's assessments of their potential to directly threaten the U.S., represents one of the most serious foreign policy failures in American history. Clinton Let Bin Laden Slip Away and Metastasize MANSOOR IJAZ December 5, 2001

To: steve harris who wrote (67833)	10/2/2005 1:06:00 PM
From: paret	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 81568

Why did clinton ignore terrorism? Richard Miniter's account of clinton's utter failure to combat terrorism provides a clue. (LOSING BIN LADEN: How Bill Clinton's Failures Unleashed Global Terror) The answer was inadvertently if somewhat obliquely provided by Madeleine Albright at the cabinet meeting that would decide the disposition of the USS Cole bombing by al Qaeda [that is to say, that would decide to do what it had always done when a "bimbo" was not spilling the beans on the clintons: Nothing]. Only Clarke wanted to retaliate militarily for this unambiguous act of war. According to Albright, a [sham] Mideast accord would yield [if not peace for the principals, surely] a Nobel Peace Prize for clinton. Kill or capture bin Laden and Clinton could kiss the accord and the Peace Prize good-bye.