Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (253512)	10/2/2005 4:24:51 PM
From: brushwud	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1571806

So you think the female judge who ruled on the case was so smitten by Clinton that she ruled against Paula Jones? Is that really what you are claiming? I hadn't given this any thought, but she was a student of his at the University of Arkansas law school. And Clinton eventually settled the case for $800,000, so any dismissal was only a waypoint in the evolution of the case. Is it really so important for you to be defending and making apologies for the Clintons ten years later? cnn.com