Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Peter Dierks who wrote (705425)	10/3/2005 4:39:54 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

I'm always happy to discuss anything that I've actually said. And, if you'd just stop putting quotation marks around fantasies that occur to you, and then attributing them as direct quotes to me... we could continue with what --- up until recently --- had been a series of interesting and friendly conversations. I am not responsible for your hallucinations though... and I don't react well (other then a hearty belly-laugh) when you wrap one of your fantasies in quotes, and claim that I actually spoke the words. 'Nuff said....

To: Peter Dierks who wrote (705425)	10/5/2005 8:01:20 AM
From: DuckTapeSunroof	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Peter... these are the lies that I have consistently objected to: "You have stated that you support triple taxation by stating that taxing a single income event three times is your preference." 1) I have NEVER 'stated that taxing a single income event three times' is what I desire. (In fact, I have specifically opposed any such idiocy, and STRONGLY support a flat tax system wherein ALL income is taxed at only one rate, regardless of source, and without mediation by 'special tax preference items' or other special loopholes, and you well know that.) 2) I have NEVER 'stated that I support 'triple taxation' and you damn well know that too. Your repetition of these lies over and over is becoming more then tiresome.... Anytime someone deliberately avoids arguing against the actual points one raises... choosing instead to make-up false claims and argue against THEM (a logical fallacy: the "strawman" argument), I take it as pretty good evidence that they feel they can't win their case, and that's why they are resorting to demagogery. Do not stay down in the muck by repeating such slimy tactics....