To: NOW who wrote (38534 ) 10/5/2005 4:16:12 PM From: mishedlo Respond to of 116555 Heinz on copper and gold Date: Wed Oct 05 2005 15:26 trotsky (@gold backwardation) ID#248269: Copyright © 2002 trotsky/Kitco Inc. All rights reserved i'm not sure if knapper's or my memory is faulty, but i don't recall to have seen gold in backwardation ever. at most there might have been cases where the contract month immdiately after the front month traded at a slight discount for a day or two, but that's more likely due to temporary liquidity issues than any 'real' backwardation. as mentioned, gold is not a normal commodity sporting JIT inventory. its large above ground stocks make a shortage practically impossible, and thus no backwardation should occur. i note Reg Howe's comments on the topic never veer from the hypothetical either. Date: Wed Oct 05 2005 15:19 trotsky (@XOI) ID#248269: now that's quite a massacre...down the equivalent of about 430 Dow points. Date: Wed Oct 05 2005 14:42 trotsky (James) ID#248269: Copyright © 2002 trotsky/Kitco Inc. All rights reserved there have been cases of backwardations artificially induced via market manipulation. many copper users are currently charging that some sort of manipulation is in fact occurring in copper right now. the charge is that hedge funds have stockpiled physical to keep official warehouse stocks tight, in order to cash in on the rally in futures and call options. however, no proof of this has been offered thus far. Date: Wed Oct 05 2005 14:39 trotsky (knapper) ID#248269: Copyright © 2002 trotsky/Kitco Inc. All rights reserved as far as i'm aware, gold has NEVER been in backwardation, and probably never will be. this is because gold is a form of money, with a large above ground stock ( so there can never be a 'shortage' of gold ) and actually paying interest. further out gold contracts reflect the interest differential between the gold lease rate and LIBOR, plus storage costs. Date: Wed Oct 05 2005 14:35 trotsky (James@metals) ID#248269: Copyright © 2002 trotsky/Kitco Inc. All rights reserved yes, of course it has happened, but usually a big correction announces itself by the market moving back into contango first. i certainly sympathize with the idea that copper is looking very stretched here - there are some warning signs insofar as OTHER base metals have failed to move into new high ground, so one could argue that this is a bearish non-confirmation. on the other hand, we don't know how high it could eventually go. today's prices are high in the context of the prices prevailing throughout most of the 90's, but they're still a good way from the previous nominal all time highs, not to mention the inflation-adjusted ATHs. what it will take, from a fundamental PoV, is demand destruction via a recession. otoh, a big price correction engendered by a recession would push the addition of fresh supplies further into the future, as new mining ventures currently planned would likely be delayed. not sure what shape this bull market will take, but i note that the 1970's commodities bull was in fact interrupted by a major correction on account of the mid 70's oil shock recession.