Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lee Webb who wrote (92720)	10/8/2005 7:31:15 PM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 122087

Lee, I'm told sentencing is now a ways away-- again. The obvious question is "why", to which I was told, sorry, the specifics are confidential. - Jeff

To: Lee Webb who wrote (92720)	10/10/2005 12:02:16 PM
From: Q.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 122087

Pacer shows that Berke has requested a delay (adjournment) in sentencing for both cases. There has not yet been a decision by the judge. Berke's letter of Sept. 20 appears on Pacer. I'll summarize it. His rationale is that the PSR Pre-sentencing report from the Probation Department is 52-pages long and very complex, requiring enormous effort on his part. Also, that in recommending a range of sentences, the Probation Department has used a new guidelines book rather than an older more lenient book that Berke thinks should apply according to the dates of the crimes. Berke asked for a delay till Nov. 12 for him to reply to the PSR, then there will be apparently several more steps before the sentencing can occur. edit -- Lee, I now see in an earlier post that you read the same filing. Message 21776461