Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: paret who wrote (254560)	10/9/2005 6:23:31 PM
From: American Spirit	Respond to of 1572630

Clinton should never have been impeached. His sex life never should have been investigated. It was a travesty of justice, a pure abuse of the special prosecutor's powers and very damaging to this country. It established an awful precedent, that is that every politician's personal life is fair game for congressional investigations even if it's just consensual sex, which is perfectly legal. For one thing, though Louis Freeh claims Clinton was not focused on Bin Lauden, it was actually the stupid Monica Lewinsky furor which made it impossible for CLinton to focus. It was going on at the very same time that he was trying to kill Bin Lauden and Republicans accused Clinton of trying to change the subject when he went after Osama with 150 Cruise Missiles and other tactics. If Clinton's sex life is fair game, then that means so is everyone's in the current White House, including whomever Jeff Gannon gay prostitute's john was, whomever let him in 197 times without credentials. And what if, by some weird chance, that gay john were Bush? Should he then be impeached for having sex? Because of course he could lie about it if asked aboutn it. WHo wouldn't?