Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Banned.......Replies to the A@P thread. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Matthew Tyson who wrote (4485)	10/10/2005 5:35:10 PM
From: left_overs	Respond to of 5425

Matthew, when I said "intimate" I meant it as you described; But for the past 6 years I have been, and I continue to be, very concerned over my personal safety and that of my family due to threats I have received from Anthony and what I know about him. Tony, and a certain few acting as his apologists here on SI, are very scary people and you have/had every right to be concerned about you and your family's personal safety. That is my point. Seeing what you have endured (and you are by no means the only one who has suffered because of Tony's threats), don't you find it extraordinary that Tony's brothers, Khaled and Walleed, and Tony's father, all have such strong and public ties to terrorist fronts? It's absolutely amazing to me that Tony is trying to play a race card. Tony even solicited donations to MTHO, an al Qeada front run by KLA members, right here on SI. Do you think no one takes Tony's apologists to task for fear of suffering what you and your family have? Surely if you have discovered Tony's ties to terrorism you would think they have as well. Why the cover-up on SI about something that is so public?

To: Matthew Tyson who wrote (4485)	10/10/2005 6:50:09 PM
From: aristox	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5425

"He threatened to hunt me down and to somehow strike me with his shoes, with his foot, and made some threat about hanging me by (an anatomical location)," Tyson said. San Diego Superior Court Judge William R. Nevitt ruled that Tyson was not blameless in the dispute, because he let his own business interests conflict with Elgindy's, even while serving as his attorney. 72.14.207.104 I continue to be, very concerned over my personal safety and that of my family due to threats I have received from Anthony

To: Matthew Tyson who wrote (4485)	10/10/2005 7:30:20 PM
From: Smiling Bob	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 5425

Maybe he was just courting you?? ...Elgindy's high-pressure stock-selling techniques were echoed in his private life. In October 1989, Mary Faith Lumpkin went so far as to seek a court order to force Elgindy to stop harassing her. "He does not give up. He will call me at home, at work. He will follow me. He will have his friends follow and call me," Lumpkin complained, adding that she feared he might turn violent. Not long after the filing, Lumpkin married Elgindy. They now have three children...