Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lee Webb who wrote (92771)	10/12/2005 7:02:08 PM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 122087

Am I correct in assuming that you meant Global Securities Corp. rather than Global Trading? Yes. Are you aware of any mention in the public record of approximately how many members had Global Securities accounts? No, sorry. The only hints are in the transcripts. For example (from Cleveland): 5 Q. Please explain the reference to how many trade at number 6 three. 7 A. How many trade at number three, there were different 8 Canadian firms that people traded at for shorting purposes 9 that we discussed in the past. We weren't allowed to say the 10 names of these firms on the chat room. Number three was 11 Global Securities. There was number one, number two, number 12 three and number four. Number one being Pacific 13 International, I believe, number two being Union Securities, 14 number three Global, and number four I think was Wolverton, 15 but we weren't allowed to say the names on the site. Again, are you aware of any mention in the public record of this big list, even in general terms? I checked the public court docs I have and asked around, but couldn't find any such record. Wish I could have been more help on this. If someone here knows more, they always have the option to private message me or you on this. - Jeff