Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LLCF who wrote (22655)	10/11/2005 11:59:08 PM
From: Solon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 28931

"I would categorize most of these as agnostics if they really sat down and discussed it" Right or wrong, it bears little on the question... "There is no need to examine, critique, etc. If god is omnipresent, omniscient, etc etc as all the mystics from all the major religions describe" Why would you assert such a silly statement? Even if a religion does assert such nonsense...why should I even give it a wink? "then how could the fish describe the water?? He doesn't know 'air'... he can't compare" It does not need to know air to describe water. There could be air, fair, wair, nair, and tare. You do not need to know the unknown to describe the known. So humankind describes reality with integrity knowing it is imperfectly comprehended.