SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: goldworldnet who wrote (706864)10/11/2005 2:43:37 PM
From: Orcastraiter  Respond to of 769670
 
Most of the disputed monuments are not 200 years old. Many of them were put in place in the 50's. Some are older.

I'd prefer that the monuments that are in violation of the law to be rededicated at a place of worship, on private property. There they can be publicly viewed, and pose no conflict with the law. There is no justification for the display of religious monuments on public property. The law is clear on that.

Orca



To: goldworldnet who wrote (706864)10/11/2005 2:54:30 PM
From: trouthead  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
It doesn't matter how long it's been going on. Women didn't have the right to vote until it was challenged. That is why the supreme court is there. So that cases may be brought and tested against the constitution.

jb


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News