SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sam who wrote (172375)10/12/2005 10:38:40 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 281500
 
Judge Lifts Contempt of Court Citation for Miller

mediainfo.com

NEW YORK - Judith Miller's second appearance before the grand jury probing the Plame/CIA leak case on Wednesday lasted only a little more than an hour but it was enough to earn a judge's order releasing The New York Times reporter from the contempt-of-court citation that landed her in jail.

The order was still in place until her testimony was complete.

Besides liberating Miller, it also means The New York Times can no longer cite that order as a roadblock to keep it from presenting a full accounting of related matters.

"I am delighted that the contempt order has been lifted, and Judy is now completely free to go about her great reporting as a very principled and honorable reporter," said Robert Bennett, one of Miller's attorneys.

Bill Keller, executive editor of the Times, had said in a letter to newsroom staffers on Tuesday that once Ms. Miller's "obligations to the grand jury are fulfilled, we intend to write the most thorough story we can...." He also criticized "armchair critics" and those who had spread rumors and "myths" about the case.

A New York Times spokeswoman told E&P the paper had no comment about Wednesday's proceedings and would not say when any major article would appear.

That leaves Karl Rove, the White House, to testify this week, for the fourth time. Thursday appears to be the likely date and Fitzgerald may move quickly after that to produce indictments.



To: Sam who wrote (172375)10/13/2005 7:26:55 AM
From: jttmab  Respond to of 281500
 
Be careful of what you wish for.

I'll plead guilty of not using the best choice of words. The context was for specialists in flu virus spread.

"Saddam has nukes and will soon be coming to a shopping center near you."

Even before the invasion the evidence that Saddam had WMD was increasingly shown to be shaky at best and more often than not just plain wrong.

jttmab