Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sidney Reilly who wrote (11784)	10/13/2005 1:22:31 PM
From: Orcastraiter	Respond to of 20039

So it says. The format on the NYT server was wide and long, and impossible to read without reformatting...so I did it here for the convenience of SI readers. I don't know what to think of eyewitnesses saying it was a military plane, other than it's troubling if true. Orca

To: Sidney Reilly who wrote (11784)	10/24/2005 12:35:36 AM
From: TigerPaw	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20039

he and another fireman saw for themselves flashes from detonations at the bottom of the tower before it came down. Why then didn't the tower begin to come apart from the bottom? It fell apart from the point of impact, which is easy to see in any movie of the tower one or two coming down. If the bottom had been exploded, the lower floors would have begun crunching and the building would appear to sink almost intact until impacting on the debris pile. You can see this kind of collapse on almost any of the videos of a building being demolished. The twin towers remained structurly sound at the bottom until the roof came crashing in, floor by floor by floor to the bottom. TP