Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (92834)	10/13/2005 12:29:28 AM
From: just_a_question	Respond to of 122087

Mr. Mitchell, Amr had access to millions of dollars to help build a defense. Surely you don't think all of his lawyers were incompetent. I prefer to read evidence presented at trial. It is possible that Matthew P. Tyson is telling the truth in this post. Message 21779708 Actual evidence presented at trial will give a basis for constructive discussion of the events. It would not have been wise for Amr to take the stand. Mr. Breen would have annihilated him. Amr still had the ability, the dollars, and the lawyers to put on a defense. What was the defense presented at trial concerning this charge? I did a little research into some information that was posted by the Mystery Magician. The next to the last sentence at Answers.com brings to mind a question. It appears that Silicon Investor is not the place to talk about such matters. However, that sentence makes me wonder why you aren't more interested in the Muslim-Named covert operative for which Amr has been unable to gather any significant information. That sentence should also make Amr do a little thinking about your role in posting his manifestos which clearly do him more harm than good