Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: steve harris who wrote (255072)	10/13/2005 4:13:34 AM
From: Elroy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573220

I value an unborn child a lot more than a fertilized chicken egg. I can't believe you think they are the same... Hmmm, well presumably you eat fertilized chicken eggs. What exactly do you plan to do with all these unborn children you want to save....?

To: steve harris who wrote (255072)	10/13/2005 12:07:07 PM
From: American Spirit	Respond to of 1573220

You said UNBORN, that means they don't exist yet. That means potentially future babies, not present tense. That means something the size of a pea, nothing visibly human. So you're trying to protect something theoretical, that might develop if everything goes well. You're also trying to play God with other peoples' bodies, womens bodies. You're trying to dictate what eomen can do with their bodies. And since you're a man that makes you a sexist. You're also contributing to world over-population (a huge problem, really THE problem) and trying to legislate peoples' lives. Abortion is legal. So says the Constitution. So you're also suggesting something illegal. I would agree with you though on late term abortions. If a woman gets halfway there she should have to finish if she can, unless her life is in danger.