Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (142762)	10/13/2005 2:59:16 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793905

If something is by higher percentage, then logically it is not 0% and concluding it is the same as 100% assumes one is using a relative description in place of all. You first proffers were devoid of logic. You recollection is devoid of reality. As to uptight, I feel happy and trusting and confident enough to post using my real name and identity. I judge using logic and attempt as best I'm able to quantify and qualify my judgements. Now using = implies 100% connection. It implies all. Thus all your logic using = is in fact devoid of basic logic. I would hope all decent people would get uptight in some scenarios. Uptight like beauty is in the eyes fo the beholder. Decent like beauty is in the eyes fo the beholder. judgmental as a negative like beauty is in the eyes fo the beholder. Your complete lack of logic will be seen by even blind folks.