Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (142803)	10/13/2005 6:28:08 PM
From: KLP	Respond to of 793914

Never mind, kholt....just consider the source for some of that. You and I may not always agree, but I can certainly vouch for the fact you are logical, even if your argument is pitched in the direction you wish it to go. But then, don't we all do that. Yes, I think so.

To: Lane3 who wrote (142803)	10/13/2005 6:50:52 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	Respond to of 793914

I don't see hperbole in the use of the word idiot or stupid. An idiot is stupid and stupid is clueless. It's concise and accurate. The moderator does not care for such bluntness. That is his complete right. As to share them rationale, if you get it fine, if you don't and cannot figure it out, that's life. If you don't get saying X=Y is like X is 100% of Y, what is to explain. X is a relative percentage of Y is 0Y < X < 100% Y Ideas are like vectors and some ideas have related components. I see relationships that you seem blind to. And it seems you see relationships that are obviously faulty or false in my analysis. This is what I would call a great analogy of much of your thinking. Message 21790832