SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Epic American Credit and Bond Bubble Laboratory -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Win-Lose-Draw who wrote (43491)10/14/2005 2:26:08 PM
From: mishedlo  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 110194
 
The VIX future has a multiplier of 10. Five points is the difference between eg 12.3 and 12.8, or $50/contract. Given the inputs to the pricing model have a maximum resolution of barely 10 cents, I don't think it's reasonable to expect a tighter match than that.

Thats what I thought we were talking about.
As long as it was not 12 to 17!
Had to make sure.

I agree that is "pretty reasonable" given the illiquidity of the futures and the low volume of trading.

I think I have this correct now, and in fact I think I had it nearly correct from the begining. This thing started off with me saying the futures always looked 30 days ahead even at expiry and many here seemed to disagree with that. What I did not know was that $VIX looked 30 days ahead too.

Thanks
Hopefully this is now fully resolved for everyone.

Mish



To: Win-Lose-Draw who wrote (43491)10/14/2005 2:56:51 PM
From: Chaka  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 110194
 
<<
...5 or 6 points sounds significant...

The VIX future has a multiplier of 10. Five points is the difference between eg 12.3 and 12.8, or $50/contract.>>

Multiplier of ten to VXB that is already 10 times VIX - so, it is 100 times ^VIX value or $500-$600 per contract (~ 5% at the low VIX levels that we see these days - I would hardly call this small!)

I posted the August values earlier - it was 133.x vs 128.