Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (707480)	10/15/2005 8:03:34 PM
From: paret	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

• Who was Berger calling from the Nations Archives? Guards report that he repeatedly asked for privacy so he could make phone calls as he sifted through the archives. Was he calling Clinton or trusted consigliere Bruce Lindsey - who was also brought along for the April 9 session? If so, did those coversations have anything to do with documents that later went missing? • What did Berger's notes say? National Archive regulations stipulate that anyone reviewing records may make private notes - but must relinquish them to the staff before leaving. Did Berger do that? And if he took his notes home along with the purloined documents, what happened to them? [Removing and destroying those notes would also be a crime.] By itself, the Sandy Berger scandal dwarfs by a factor of fifty anything currently being probed by Democrats and the prosecutors they're now cheering on. And while the Bush Justice Department may have gone into the tank, that's no excuse for Congress. Getting to the bottom of one of the most serious crimes in the history of the U.S. government - perpetrated with the obvious intention of subverting the 9/11 Commission's investigation - would seem to be very much in the public interest, not to mention fully within in the purview of Congress' oversight responsibility. Newsmax.com ^ \| 10/15/05 \| Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com Staff