Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Gold and Silver Stocks and Related Commentary -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: matt who wrote (18168)	10/17/2005 11:51:48 AM
From: E. Charters	Respond to of 18308

right. I was right on Crystallex. They did end up with the property. It was said by some detractors that I promoted it saying they would win the court case. I did not say that, nor did I say it was not without palpable risk. I said they deserved to win but I kept a weather eye on developments on a daily basis. I did not post much of that, but in my private newsletter no one got told to hold at all costs. Au reverso in spades. Some people were told to divest well before the court decision came down and can testify to that. I don't know about being a SA mining news hound. But it would have to be more profitable than doing it here. EC<:-}