Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: kech who wrote (256060)	10/18/2005 2:38:23 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572776

Wrong again, Mr. Kech. Right to privacy comes straight from English Common Law as does the Constitution: Fine if it is in English Common Law, maybe State Courts would accept it. But it is not in the US Constitution as such. I am not against the right to privacy, it is just that the responsibility is not up to the US Supreme Court to maintain it. Right to privacy is in the Constitution. The USSC turns to the Constitution when ruling on cases. Therefore, its not surprising that right to privacy has been invoked by the Court. And when a case that involves violations of right to privacy does make it to the USSC, they DO have a responsibility to insure that that right is protected.