Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (707765)	10/18/2005 5:41:38 PM
From: goldworldnet	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Sometimes even a constitutional amendment isn't good enough for the court. en.wikipedia.org * * *

To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (707765)	10/18/2005 8:42:48 PM
From: BEEF JERKEY	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

"And, if people don't like the way they interpret the bedrock of all our laws... they are free to ALTER the Constitution, through their political representatives or even WITHOUT their elected representatives, at will. It seems curious that those who want to "stack" the courts with people who will "misinterpret" the constitution to pursue a political agenda take that route at all. For instance if American people as a majority really thought the separation of church and state was a bunch of crap then pass a Constitutional amendment. Otherwise it’s long settled law – get over it.