SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (256404)10/19/2005 1:45:58 PM
From: Taro  Respond to of 1572204
 
Sorry, I mixed her up with Queen Elisabeth I. BIG mistake. She was The Virgin Queen (they say) and Virginia was named after her.

My mistake ripples back to my first post :(

Taro



To: combjelly who wrote (256404)10/20/2005 2:02:38 AM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572204
 
VIRGINIA"

I was afraid that is where you were going with that.

You have a better imagination than I do.

Umm, you might want to consider that Queen Victoria was born in 1819. Virginia was named in the early 1600s...

What's a 200 year miss to someone who is myth based?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News