Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: realitybytes who wrote (92914)	10/20/2005 1:14:33 PM
From: just_a_question	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 122087

Mr. RealityBytes, You have been given examples of cases that rebut your claims. Is it possible for you to actually address the issues with examples of the laws instead of resorting to ridiculous rants? Pretend you are in front of Judge Dearie and he is asking you to cite statutes and/or case law. It shouldn't be that hard for you to pretend that you are in front of Judge Dearie. He may be reading this thread or at least having a clerk read it. Do you think the Department of Justice has assigned people to keep track of the posts? The Department of Justice may be wondering why Mr. Man On The Moon is too scared to recite his no-paragraph manifesto in open court. He can attend the sentencing and vouch for Mr. Elgindy. As for trying my hand at the field,perhaps I would be a " pathetic and impotent lawyer" if I ever tried my hand in the field. Maybe I would be unable to graduate law school or pass the bar exam. JFK, Jr. certainly had difficulty getting his legal credentials. However, I have shown that I am willing to actually research the law and look for cases. You, on the other hand, are talking out of your backside and don't appear to be willing to do any actual research that would back up your claims. For example, point me to a law that states all of the possible defendants must be charged at once with all possible charges. That idea is ridiculous and can be easily rebutted. Perhaps you would also "make the most pathetic and impotent lawyer if you ever tried your hand in the field." Were Mr. Hansen's charges brought against him in a separate indictment in a separate case?