Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Big Dog's Boom Boom Room -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: stan_hughes who wrote (51926)	10/20/2005 5:18:48 PM
From: Condor	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 206325

I can envision reading an announcement from somebody or other that they have bought X% of ECA "for investment purposes" as a means of hedging their NG requirements Is the logic "if NG price rises, ECA stock price rises and offsets/makesupfor the NG price increase?". If that is correct, I wonder how the NG price rise would relate to req'd share puchase (total$ invested)? Basically I'm asking whether the investment rational could be justified? I have no idea, just asking. I appreciate the interesting theory though. C