SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Live2Sail who wrote (43452)10/21/2005 1:21:28 PM
From: GraceZRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 306849
 
28%


28% of what? The difference between the yearly turnover ratios for CA and the rest of the country?

Turnover for the whole country reached 5% in the last few years but that figure includes CA. Turnover ratios are figured by dividing the number of existing homes sold by the total housing stock in a given year. If CA is 28% lower than the rest of the country then it means the US without CA is higher than 5%, a lot higher than 5%.... which is doubtful since 5% is a figure reached rarely. At the height of the Japan bubble, 5% of the housing had turned over in the previous 5 years (as opposed to the one year we use to calculate turnover ratios).

Consider that CA accounts for a huge percentage of US existing home sales as measured by units and sales totals every single year.

How did you come up with the 28% figure?



To: Live2Sail who wrote (43452)10/21/2005 3:27:52 PM
From: XBritRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 306849
 
<28%>

Sounds about right anecdotally. For anyone who has owned their house for say 20 years, the property tax penalty of moving is enormous.