To: energyplay who wrote (1323 ) 10/22/2005 3:25:24 AM From: Maurice Winn Respond to of 220216 Good point EP. I hadn't thought of that, but it's right: <Not only is there a big shift in ad dollars from conventional media to targeted online, but total ad spend will go up. > Advertising is normally inefficient, so a lot of advertising has to be done by other means, such as word of mouth, more retail outlets for point of presence advertising, and so on. With precisely targeted advertising, the bang per buck goes up. So more advertising is economic and spending can be diverted from other activities which do the same job, such as having sales representatives, extra shops or whatever other mechanism other than advertising in media is used to generate sales. I can imagine that there might be a doubling of advertising spending. Heck, maybe even more. Maybe it would triple, or quadruple. Hmmm. Food for thought. Damn, I wish I'd thought of that BEFORE Google listed. I've thought for almost a decade that advertising in cyberspace would be huge. But I didn't think of that turbo-charging effect. Thanks for pointing it out. One of the great things about SI and cyberspace; gems pop out now and then. So, if total global advertising spend for all media is added up, how much is that? If it is tripled and moved to cyberspace, how many $$ per market capitalisation of all advertising companies is that? That would tell us whether the current market capitalisations of cyberspace advertising companies is too much or too little. I suspect it's much too low. In which case I should buy all companies listed; Yahoo! Google, Amazon, eBay and whatever. Or perhaps pick the better ones which have the best looking technology. Mqurice PS: Don't mention it to anyone so we can buy the companies before others figure it out. Hmmmm, I wonder if Google's share price means everyone except me has already figured it out.