Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bald Eagle who wrote (708298)	10/21/2005 3:12:49 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof	Respond to of 769670

Re: "Thou shalt not kill" - that seems pretty much pro-life to me. Of course. But the context of that is explained further by the specific scriptural passages where God indicated that a fetus is not a full-fledged human being yet (“not having existence”) until the "breath of life" enters, as with Adam. Further support for that is found in the specific Bible verse (the ONLY ones in the Bible that mention miscarriage/abortion) which clearly says that deliberately causing a miscarriage/abortion may be penalized but it is not murder, and that a fetus is considered more part of a woman then not. PS --- "Thou shalt not kill" is a poor English translation of the original Aramaic words. A proper translation from the source text is rendered as "Thou shalt not murder". Thus, killing in a just war, or in defense of life, is 'killing', but need not be 'murder'.