SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bill who wrote (708330)10/21/2005 3:26:53 PM
From: HPilot  Respond to of 769670
 
...which reminds me of the increased lung cancer and emphysema risks of pot.

Obviously true, but also not a factor of legalization.



To: Bill who wrote (708330)10/21/2005 3:29:53 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
No definitive evidence for either claim AT ALL.

As a mater of fact, the most recent studies show that the active ingredients of pot *relax* the constriction of the air sacks in the lungs (EXACTLY the OPPOSITE of what tobacco does), and so may be of benefit to asthmatics --- although no reputable medical professional suggests that people smoke anything.

As far as 'cancer', are you aware of the recent double-blind Portugal study that showed the active ingredients of pot to have cancer cell destroying abilities? (Or of the earlier 1970's US government study that showed the same anti-cancer properties... and that the DEA subsequently removed from all government libraries?)