Not getting enough, eh.
<<OK. Elm wrote to get you.>>
… Eh? What are you talking about?
<<Please wrote detailed rebuttals instead of being general and unprecise again>>
… Eh? But I think I understand what you wish for.
<<You wrote you are in a neutral position (Should I write I do not care about it one way or the other type) in dealing with Taiwan and China affairs. Is that correct?>>
… Without needing the benefit of reflection, I confirm that your words within the parenthesis describes my feel pretty well.
<<First of all. Am I really doing naught by uncovering dirty tricks from CCP to Chineses ???? >>
… No, if that is what you did and are doing, otherwise naught, as I had observed.
<<Do you know those millions and millions average Chinese and anti-corruption government officials try very hard to unearth the very "naught" you just mentioned>>
… Yes, and I fully concur with the millions and millions, without having to agree with you. So, my naught does not apply to the millions.
<<In fact those forces are the very reasons CCP can survive up to now>>
… Yes, in some sense, but too simplistic otherwise, born, I suppose, of un-thought, or naivety, I guess.
<<You just denied every intention your grandpa tried in his years>>>
… You misunderstood, clouded by fury.
<<Ha Ha Ha to your "naught">>
… Very unbecoming, and not genuine Ha Ha Ha.
<<Why do you ask when you already make up your mind for not listening?>>
… I believe the approach must be from within, from top to bottom, and from bottom to top, and takes much time, without easy answers. Other approaches, while interesting, and I have heard many, thought about a lot, are all flawed one way or another. I actually have never heard your approach, and so asked, and I still have not heard your approach.
<<"""I will simply say I am at the very least helping to establish a middle class in the vast land, and have done plenty compared to most, and have an approach that is in fact working, demonstrably, at the very least"""
<<And yet, your neutral position told me you do not care if barbarian CCP attacked Taiwan or not at all>>
… Hey wait a mo, that is not what I said, now, was it? That is a real question.
<<By even just verbaly attacking Taiwan from CCP you are still in a neutral position to allow barbarian CCP of doing so?>>
What did you just say. Who attacked Taiwan verbally, as opposed to stating the obvious, or speculated on its inevitable future. Be precise.
<<Am I correct?>> … correct on what?
<<Did CCP threaten to kill or take over your wife/coconut or your gold vaults at all while you are helping Chinese?>>
… Not yet.
<<Did you even express your disgusts toward yourself (neutral position) CCP and YiWu type (threaten to kill) at all>>
… Neutral on a silly business is never disgusting, and the business between the mainland and Taiwan is very silly, IMO. The outcome, IMO, is also very predictable and inevitable. Thinking otherwise will likely result in disappointment.
<<You refused to stop CCP and YIWu's written abuses up to now>>
… Why do I need to stop YiWu? How? What would it do? Do I stop you? No? Why are we talking about stopping then?
<<Jay. Why do you praise your secrecy business in such a high moral ground?>>
… because (a) it is focused on global Chinese culture and history, (b) unique, (c) fun, and (d) is already a proven platform for many good acts.
<<You are simply a businessman like those around the world tried to help China but discredit on an as needed basis by YiWu and CCP.>>
… Actually no, not this particular business, because it is full-spectrum and invasive, unstoppable easily now, and altogether unstoppable eventually, unless someone buys it and shuts it down.
<< you are the first one to question me on those "Chinese" /"non Chinese" taunts in your early posts to me when I explained I am a Taiwanese/Chinese/Amercian>>
… what are you talking about? Oh, you are just imagining again.
<<I have lots of fun so far from your emotional posts as well>>
… eh, emotional, that’s funny.
<<Punching Lee Tung Hui as a sand bag is like punching your very own grandpa>>
… yeah, you would think that, but I guess majority decides, democratically, on balance, and the weight of history arbitrates, in the end.
<<written abuses and intolerance against Lee …>>
… Actually it is because statement of the obvious is too easy, the guy is trained but uneducated, IME, a traitor to all his past buddies (morally dispicable on its own demerit, regardless of anything else), a historical fact, and a defacto worshipper of Japanese war criminals (by his recent media comments); but, he is powerless against the inevitable, which ought to do him well, as in keeps him busy day and night :0)
<<you worth nothing to your heart. You and those barbarians CCP owed Mr. Lee (use him as a punching target)>>
… too emotional, dramatic, and not exactly rational, but presumably therapeutic ... TeoTwawKi journey tends to be like that ... fun.
Chugs, J |
