Hello Frank, <<question I have ask 4 times now what particulary do you find unacceptable about romans post?>>
… particularly, I thought I had answered your question, that he starts out by implicitly denying a fact, and thus making his entire paper less than useful, so tainted by a deliberate wrong premise. Nothing more than that in the first paragraph, but enough already.
<<Is that all?>>
… That is all is necessary.
<<Please don't be like british who hated grandfather and advocated IGNORE button by looking only at books cover>>
The British was correct from their stance, but they simply failed to realize what would prove to be … oops, there is that word again, inevitable.
<<then can you offer good dissenting read on CCP white paper anaylsis that is original, not silly and worthy?>>
Why? The White Paper is drivel as well, merely stating what will prove to be inevitable, from yet another perspective, and given the perspective, pointless.
<<You feel I was brian H and get emotional>>
No, I do not get emotional. I get entertained. I figured it might be you, obviously, and I was correct, as is often the case :0)
I think it is possible to discern the likely inevitable (yes, a contradiction, deliberate and deliberated), and as events unfold, as long as they unfold in a way that indicates the starting premise to be correct, then we simply hold on for the next unfolding, again, once more, until TeoTwawKi.
Now, should a messenger come forth with a message that takes care of all the facts but point to a different truth, then we deliberate.
However, should a messenger come forth with a nmessage that starts out in the very first paragraph denyingthe obvious and apparent, well, we perhaps can spent our time more astutely, like going grocery shopping, or changing baby's diaper.
<<Anyways lets move on to something more exciting - In this age of globalism - can commecial property bubbles in UK, USA, Australia also have affect on Asian commercial real estate if they bust?>>
My guess is yes, absolutely, and will, as before and always, prove to be a buying opportunity.
<<I hate to see what happen in Japan expand globally>>
… I think it is inevitable, and must be leverage to a noble end, or, at least exploited for a quick flip.
The source of liquidity is the FED, and one pool aggregated is Japan. When the liquidity steams, expands, and vaporizes, all that is floated by the liquidity would ... well, bad things happen, but in different ways and via various mechanism.
I saw the article and actually posted it earlier. I think the prospects and possibilities are very exciting, or as a malaysian Chinese might say, "so good-la".
Chugs, J |
