SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sioux Nation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: American Spirit who wrote (44831)10/23/2005 7:39:14 PM
From: SiouxPal  Respond to of 362423
 
Hey that's the Post 'O The Day. Thanks. That was a very easy decision. I still don't know who you are, and I suppose that is fine with me.
You do speak quite well most of the time IMO.
You get right to the point.
You cut out the bullshid.



To: American Spirit who wrote (44831)10/23/2005 7:41:28 PM
From: sea_biscuit  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 362423
 
In fact the correct vote was in the middle.

Since it was Dumbya and his bloodthirsty warmongers that would interpret the vote, the correct vote was a "No" one. Have you listened to Byrd's speech before he voted against the resolution? It was clear as daylight that a vote for it would be used by Dumbya and his gangsters to wage war on Iraq.

I have never been to Washington (save for a brief afternoon visit many years ago), and even I was able to understand what a "Yes" vote implied.



To: American Spirit who wrote (44831)10/24/2005 9:47:06 AM
From: Wharf Rat  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 362423
 
Wrong. The "profile in courage" Kerry would have voted against. There was no middle, unless you are a politician. If war was obvious to me, it should have been obvious to Kerry. Quit making excuses. He fucked up and is a Bush enabler. And he hasn't held Shrub's feet to the fire; he "had a better plan".