Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sioux Nation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SiouxPal who wrote (44843)	10/23/2005 8:16:20 PM
From: sea_biscuit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 362465

Did you like Kerry when he wiped George all over the stage 3 times in a row? Yes. Did John not show true bravery in the Nam? Do you have to die there to gain respect? You ever fight for your very existence? Yes, no and no. The point is that we should have again seen the young Kerry who braved criticism to come out against the war 3 decades ago. Instead we saw a Kerry who was "afraid" to "offend" the undecideds. He wanted to play safe and got screwed. As for the Iraq answer, even I could have given a better answer than Kerry did. No, if I knew Iraq didn't have those WMDs, I would have concentrated my attention on Afghanistan instead (remember we still haven't caught Osama). And there is no way the corporate media would have been able to say Kerry was soft on terrorism -- not when he is going after the murderous Osama who is still on the loose.